Apple Vs. Samsung – A $1 Billion dollar Law Suit

 
Judge Koh during the reading of the verdict.
(Credit:
Vicki Behringer)

 

 

“SAN JOSE, Calif. — It wasn’t even close.
After 21 hours of
deliberation, a nine-person jury has sided with Apple on a majority of
its patent infringement claims against Samsung Electronics. The jury
also awarded Apple more than $1 billion in damages.
Apple had
originally sought $2.75 billion in damages, and though it wasn’t
unanimous on all counts, the verdict was overwhelmingly in Apple’s
favor. Samsung, which asked for $421 million in its counter-suit, did not
receive a nickel. (Refer to jury document at the end of this story.)
The scorecard highlights:

  • Jury found Samsung infringement of Apple utility, design patents for some (though not all) products.
  • Jury found willful infringement on five of six patents.
  • Jury upheld Apple utility, design patents.
  • Jury upheld Apple trade dress ‘983.
  • Jury found Samsung “diluted” Apple’s registered
    iPhone, iPhone 3, and “Combination iPhone” trade dress on some products, not on others.
  • Jury found no Apple infringement of Samsung utility patents.
  • Jury found Samsung did not violate antitrust law by monopolizing markets related to the UMTS standard.
  • Damages owed by Samsung: $1.05 billion ($1,049,393,540 to be exact)
  

The jury informed the court at 2:35 p.m. that it had reached a
verdict, which was read in front of District Judge Lucy H. Koh as soon
as the parties were assembled. The speed of the verdict apparently came
as a surprise: One of Apple’s lawyers walked into the courtroom wearing a
polo shirt and jeans, so clearly he wasn’t expecting this today.

The trial, which stretched more than three weeks, was characterized
by a bewildering and massive trove of evidence that unveiled some of
each companies’ biggest secrets. By any measure, this was a complex case
that presented jurors with page after page of technical minutiae. To
reach their decision, jurors had to work through a 20-page document that
required them to discern which devices from the two companies infringed
on which patents — a daunting task considering Apple had accused
nearly two dozen of Samsung’s devices of violating patents.

For Apple, information revealed during the trial included prototypes of iPhone and
iPad
designs that never saw the light of day, as well as highly detailed
financial data that went far beyond what the company typically makes
public. There were also e-mails between executives, one of which
included mention of high interest in a smaller version of the iPad.

For Samsung, it was a series of damning internal documents, many of
which showed that the company looked to Apple’s devices for cues when
designing its software icons and general features. One such internal
report contained numerous side-by-side slides in which the company put a
prerelease version of its initial Galaxy smartphone next to the iPhone
and offered suggestions on how to make the Galaxy more similar to the
Apple device.

Historians may want to note that all this took place as Tim Cook celebrated his first anniversary as CEO.

Samsung released the following statement after the verdict was delivered”